February 1990. A woman's body is found near the Spokane River. By May, there are three: Yolanda Sapp, twenty-six. Nickie Lowe, thirty-four. Kathleen Brisbois, thirty-eight. All shot. All working the corridor along East Sprague Avenue. All belonging, in the eyes of a city that preferred not to look, to a world it had already decided not to worry about.
Then the killings stopped as suddenly as they began. No suspect. No confession. No witness.
THE EVIDENCE SAT IN A LOCKER THE ENTIRE TIME. THE SCIENCE TO READ IT DID NOT EXIST YET.
Detectives had animal hairs, fibers, and a partial fingerprint — fragments 1990 forensics could catalogue but not interpret, with no national DNA database to compare them against even if they could. A false lead nearly folded the file permanently into a far larger serial murder investigation. Two generations of Spokane homicide detectives inherited the case. Three families waited without a name.
Then, in 2012, a profile entered a federal database after an unrelated conviction — and matched material recovered from beneath a victim's fingernails twenty-two years earlier.
THIS BOOK DOES NOT INVENT A SINGLE LINE OF DIALOGUE.
Most true crime fills its silences with imagined scenes, invented thoughts, and dramatized reconstructions. THE SPOKANE RIVER MURDERS does not. Every date, ruling, and finding here is drawn from public court filings, the published Washington Court of Appeals opinion, and documented news reporting on the investigation, the 2017 trial, the conviction of Donna Perry, and the three consecutive life sentences that followed. Where the record is silent, this book says so — and tells you exactly where interpretation begins.
WHAT YOU WILL CLOSE THIS BOOK KNOWING:
How a cold case is actually built, lost, and reopened — the full arc from 1990 evidence collection to CODIS to a Spokane County courtroom in 2017
What DNA evidence can and cannot prove, and why a database match is the beginning of a prosecution rather than the end of one
Why offenders who target sex workers, runaways, and marginalized victims stay undetected the longest — and what that cost these three families
The trial in full: the prosecution's theory, the defense's argument, the verdict, the sentencing, and the appeal that followed
Who Yolanda, Nickie, and Kathleen were as people, restored from headline to history
The wider forensic landscape, in dedicated chapters on genetic genealogy and its privacy limits, life inside a cold case unit, the ethics of writing about real victims, and what unresolved grief does to a family across decades
Plus a complete timeline of events, a glossary of forensic and legal terms, and discussion questions built for classrooms and book clubs
WHO THIS BOOK IS FOR:
True crime readers who are tired of speculation, invented dialogue, and cases that get sensationalized instead of explained
Anyone drawn to cold cases, forensic breakthroughs, DNA investigation, and unsolved murder files
Criminology, criminal justice, and forensic science students and instructors who need a real, sourced case study
Book clubs wanting a serious nonfiction title with built-in discussion material
True crime podcast listeners who want the documented case file behind the episode
Readers who believe how a justice system treats its most overlooked victims is the truest measure of it
Some cases go cold because nobody is looking. This one went cold because the science had not caught up — and because three women were the kind of victims a city found easy to set aside.
It took twenty-seven years to give their families a name.
Scroll up and click Buy Now to read the case in full.