In his language, slavery becomes a mode of exploitation but a moral stain that must be expiated through revolutionary violence; emancipation is framed almost soteriologically, as a moment of historical redemption through struggle. The war, in Marx's telling, takes on the form of a purgation both ethical and structural in which history, like a hidden god, passes judgment upon the old order and brings forth a new stage of human development. This mode of presentation retains traces of German Protestant eschatology, refracted through the secular logic of dialectical materialism. The North's military victory is interpreted less as a contingent outcome than the historical realization of freedom's inevitability, echoing a teleological vision where history unfolds toward liberation by necessity rather than chance. Freud's objections to Marxism, though formulated decades later, strike at these very assumptions.
Freud was skeptical of Marx's belief in the inherent rationality and progressivity of history, viewing such confidence as a secular substitution for religious eschatology. He challenged Marxism's belief in the perfectibility of society through structural change alone, arguing that the human psyche riddled with conflict, repression, and irrational drives could not be transformed simply by altering economic conditions. Where Marx sees alienation as historically contingent and resolvable, Freud sees it as rooted in the irreconcilable tensions of civilization itself. Marx's view of liberation assumes the unity of desire, reason, and historical necessity; Freud's anthropology denies that unity ever existed.